Tampons, a staple in feminine hygiene, are being studied for their potential to expose individuals to metals and metalloids. A recent investigation titled Tampons as a source of exposure to metal(loid)s analysed the presence of a range of metal(loid)s in tampons, a topic that had not been extensively explored prior to this study.
We strive to offer an impartial overview of the research, highlighting its discoveries and significance for users of these products. We will also discuss the steps that Citron Hygiene and our partners at Aunt Flow are taking to tackle this issue.
A summary of the recent study that measured metals in tampons
The research examined the presence of different metals in tampons and involved analysing various brands and types of tampons and using strict testing methods to detect the presence of metals. The results showed that tampons do contain small amounts of metals, which has sparked a discussion about the potential health and safety implications.
The study detected various metals, including aluminium, chromium, manganese, iron, nickel, copper, zinc, arsenic, selenium, and lead, in different brands and types of tampons. This indicates that the manufacturing process and the raw materials can influence the metal content. Although the levels of these metals are generally low, their presence in internally used tampons raises concerns about potential health risks.
The study was cautious in drawing direct conclusions about the health implications of its findings and called for further research in this area. It pointed out that the regular use of tampons by menstruating individuals may result in cumulative exposure to certain metals, warranting further investigation. The researchers stressed the importance of conducting more comprehensive studies to fully understand the potential impacts of long-term exposure to these trace metals through tampons.
In response to these findings, the study advocated for more transparent labelling by manufacturers, enabling consumers to make informed choices about the products they use. It also emphasises the importance of monitoring and investigating personal care products.
The health effects of trace metal(loid)s in tampons have yet to be fully understood. This research emphasises the need for further study to protect consumer health. As a precautionary measure, it is advisable to select brands that openly share their production and sourcing practices.
How does this study affect Citron Hygiene customers with Aunt Flow programs?
Citron Hygiene chose to partner with Aunt Flow for several reasons, one of the main ones being that we believe that menstruators deserve access to healthy, organic period products that are sustainably produced.
Aunt Flow is dedicated to being transparent about the ingredients in their period products. They prioritise choosing the best quality materials and manufacturers. Their tampons and pads are made with 100% organic cotton and organic top sheets in facilities with the highest safety standards, research, and fair-trade practices. This information was outlined in their blog as a response to a specific study.
Aunt Flow tampons have Dermatest certifications in order to confirm that they are:
• Dermatologically tested
• Suitable for sensitive skin
• Gynaecology tested
Aunt Flow tampons are also:
• FDA certified
• Organic Content Standard (OCS) certified
• Free of phthalates, chlorine, BPA, fragrances and dyes
Aunt Flow’s suppliers and manufacturers are also taking this study seriously and pursuing the OEKO-TEX certification immediately (expected within 60 days) to test for harmful substances in their materials.
What about customers with other tampon brands in their washrooms?
Citron Hygiene has not received any responses from other manufacturers of the tampons we supply, but we will update this blog if and when we do.
This study has highlighted not only the historic lack of research into women’s health, but also the need to make a societal shift toward higher standards for everyone.
Content Disclosure
This content was partially generated by AI, using source material, and was edited by a human.
